|
Recent projects:
| Council Retirement Pay
| Red Light Camera Investigation
| Public Safety Negotiations
| Opposed 2009 property tax increase
| Aurora employee salary structure exposé
| Exposed 2010 Lend Lease Tax
| Tax Increment Financing Giveaway
| GID Mission Viejo
|
Contact us
Citizens for Responsible Aurora Government
Citizens for Responsible Aurora Government, or CRAG is
a citizens group dedicated to accountability, transparency,
and fiscal responsibility in the city of Aurora, Colorado.
|
Aurora City Council - Term Limits or Term Hiatus
April 11, 2013
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(Aurora) - "Politicians are like diapers and should be changed often" - Paul Harvey
Not content with the original constitutional
limit of two elected terms,
in 2005 Aurora City Council convinced voters to
approve measure 2B,
which initially provided some Aurora City Council members three (4 year) terms.
In 2009, Aurora City Council again convinced voters to
approve measure 2A,
which allowed for all remaining incumbents, Wards and At-Large positions, three (4 year) terms.
Upon further reflection, it appears that voters have approved an unlimited amount
of three consecutive (4) year stretches of service for city council, providing they
take the required 4 year break between 12 year periods.
As noted in the following presentation by Aurora activist, Duane Senn:
"Aurora's term hiatus for council members is reminiscent of the Roman idea of dignatas.
Dignatas was the personal self-worth, the personal prestige, and the personal status
that entitled them to be counselor after sitting out a specified number of years.
We do not believe that Aurora's voters approved a Term Hiatus when they increased
term limits from two terms to three terms."
As Senn noted in his presentation: "We are asking you to amend the Aurora term
limit ordinance 2009-30, so it becomes a specific number of terms an elected official can serve;
a lifetime term limit [total of 12 years]. "
Several of the public servants who are currently occupying Aurora City Council,
have made a lifetime political career of rotating in and out of the mayor and council positions.
Some council members have become adept at gaming the system.
This year voters in Aurora will be electing (2) new at-large and (3) new Ward members.
We will encourage voters to consider this issue when selecting new council members.
~ ### ~
Citizens for Responsible Aurora Government (CRAG),
is a citizens group dedicated to accountability,
transparency, and fiscal responsibility in the City
of Aurora, Colorado.
You can contact us at 720.295.8402, email us at
info@cragaurora.com,
or visit our web site at
cragaurora.com
~ ### ~
Aurora FanFair Purchase - A Plethora of Questions
Aurora Water - Banker to the City
December 13, 2012
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Between the details surrounding the Aurora Urban Renewal
Authority (AURA) loan from the Aurora Water Department and
the estimated cost associated with purchase, site cleanup
and demolition, and potential loan interest, the recently
approved purchase of the FanFair property by the City of
Aurora raises many questions.
Desperate to find a solution to remove an iconic eyesore
in old Aurora, City Council and the Aurora Urban Renewal
authority (AURA) have approved a plan to obtain a $4 million
dollar loan from the Aurora Water Department Enterprise to
purchase the 10.5 acre FanFair property.
Link.
Highlighting the city's ongoing inability to save any spare
cash for unplanned efforts, the city and AURA are going hat in
hand to the stand-alone enterprise Aurora Water Department to obtain
a loan to buy the property. You can review the December 3rd
(preliminary resolution) version and bond debt service schedule
here. (Link)
AURA plans to either obtain the property as is
and clean it up or purchase the property with the building
demolished and the site already remediated.
The loan and the final amended version of the resolution are
conveniently skirting the TABOR component of the state constitution
about incurring debt without a vote of the people (Taxpayer Bill of Rights).
AURA is using the Aurora Water Department as their own personal piggy bank.
This past year, the Aurora Water Department has made several deals to
enhance their cash flows, due to anticipated revenue shortfalls.
Those deals include:
- Water Sales for Fracking
(Link)
- Water Sales to a Bottling Company
(Link)
- WISE sales to other municipalities
(Link)
Apparently Aurora's City Council Members have found a big bag of
cash in the Water Department's reserve fund that they can loan to
Aurora's Urban Renewal Authority. Aurora Water finds its
organization in the bank loan business.
Video segments of the final hearing at the Aurora City Council from
December 3rd can be viewed as follows. Our first video link
provides an explanation of the resolution
(Link )
The second link
is a presentation against the action.
(Link)
The third link is an approved motion to amend the resolution.
(Link)
The resolution amendment would transfer responsibility for the loan from AURA to
the city general fund if the AURA is ever at risk of defaulting on the loan.
The term of the loan is for up to 25 years.
AURA would only pay interest for the first five years.
If the property is not sold, yearly payments
(interest & principle) could be shifted to the city general fund,
again without a vote of the people.
If for some reason the city cannot sell the property, the payback
to the Aurora Water Department would amount to
$5.545 million over the 25-year life of the agreement.
In addition to the funding issues, the property appraisal
documentation highlights the following issues:
- The appraiser notes ". . . it is our opinion
that the cash market value on a fee simple basis of the land as
though clean and vacant as of June 25, 2012 was $4,000,000.
The "as-is" value of the property including existing improvements
is $77,000."
"It is important to note that the "vacant and clean"
land valuation is based on a hypothetical condition, the use of
which might have affected assignment results. The "as-is"
valuation is based on adoption of remediation and demolition cost
estimates provided to us by the City of Aurora."
(Link)
- Building demolition and estimated cleanup costs:
- Environmental abatement: Estimated cost including contingencies, is $2.5 million
- Demolition and removal of the structure following abatement $1.1 million
- The appraiser goes on to say "Thus, the total estimated cost was $3.6
million to create a clean, vacant site ready for redevelopment.
Link
Note that this does not include groundwater remediation."
(Link)
- Note! The state is requiring the owner to do additional clean up testing.
- Results from these tests will be available on December 20th.
- Purchase agreement
(Link)
- Appraisal notes "No internal inspection of property"
(Link)
CRAG is supportive of the effort to clean up and redevelop this
site. The path that the public servants at city council have chosen
to take, is an affront to the water customers and taxpayers of
Aurora. The old adage that "The End Justifies the Means" seems to
apply to the city.
~ ### ~
Aurora Schools Tax Hike - Because they are entitled
September 20, 2012
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(Aurora) - Just four years after Aurora voters generously approved two tax and bond
measures (3A & 3B), the Aurora Public School (APS) district is back, asking for
yet more of your hard earned money, with measure 3C.
Measure 3A from 2008 increased property taxes by $14.7 million annually,
for the following purposes:
Institute programs to decrease the dropout rate (then and now)
Recruit teachers and staff
Expand full day kindergarten
Update instructional technology
Measure 3B from 2008 authorized additional debt to the tune of $215 million,
with a repayment cost not to exceed $475 million. This bond measure,
funded by a property tax, provided for a laundry list of school construction,
repair and technology projects.
With the new measure 3C, APS wants an additional $15 million.
Exhibit A
Each year, every APS student is directly provided $8,151.00 in funding from the
state, local, federal and other sources.
Arapahoe-Adams Funds
In 2011, if you include school bonds, federal and other grants,
the total funding per student is $10,038.00
The current average total property tax mill levy for APS 28J, which includes the
general fund and bond payments, totals 53.919 mills.
If this measure passes the new average mill levy will be 62.859 mills.
This new tax, dedicated to APS 28J schools,
would increase your dedicated school property tax by over 16%.
Currently the majority of all property tax that you pay, goes to the Aurora Public School
district 28J.
In fact, on average, 66% of your entire property tax bill goes to
Aurora Public Schools.
With the ongoing economic recession, state funding for school districts has decreased
slightly over the past several years. APS is loath to have to operate on slightly
less funds and is going back to the local taxpayers for more money. APS believes that
they should not have to give up any of the funding to which they have become accustomed.
APS believes they are entitled.
This tax is permanent.
-
Voters have an opportunity to say NO
-
Voters can tell APS to STOP asking for more
-
Voters can tell APS to live with their existing budgets, like Aurora residents do
-
Voters can tell APS to consider decreasing their own compensation, like many Aurora
taxpayers have been forced to do over the past several years.
Tell this local government entity that enough is enough. Vote NO on measure 3C.
~ ### ~
2012 Aurora Tax Hike - Extend . . . Pretend . . . Spend
August 28, 2012
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
[Aurora] - Election 2012 must be just around the corner.
Aurora City Council, by a vote of 9-1 (Berzins voting no),
has referred this year's tax hike measure (2B) to the ballot.
Utilizing the annual fall ballot opportunity, the city council has referred a $74
million bond issue on the ballot (up to $135 million total with interest),
to fund a plethora of pet transportation projects.
http://www.cragaurora.com/Aurora2012TaxHike.PDF
Two bond issues from 1998 & 2000, which purchased the Alameda/I-225 interchange,
public safety, parks and open space, and library projects are due to be paid off by December 2015.
http://www.cragaurora.com/Bond_Issues_1998_and_2000.PDF
Once taxpayers pay off these bonds, the city component of property taxes will be reduced 19%.
The majority on the Aurora City Council dislikes the idea of paying off the bonds,
and wants taxpayers to keep paying for another 20 years.
Yes, they have created this year's forever tax.
For more information on the history of tax mill levy extension, click here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSxSYb2E-c4&feature=youtu.be
The 2012 Aurora tax hike amounts to Extend - Pretend - Spend.
Council would extend the property tax, pretend
it is not a tax increase and spend the money.
One of the more egregious of the proposed new projects is an approximate 50%
contribution of $6,000,000 for a new 900 space parking garage for the RTD facility
at Iliff and I-225. Amazing. Residents already pay a 1% RTD sales tax.
Why would voters want to double tax themselves, by paying for a new structure that
RTD ought to build?
The Aurora taxpayer contribution per parking space would be $6700.
They will have Cadillac accommodations for the Cadillacs that will park there.
http://www.cragaurora.com/Parking_Garage.PDF
http://www.cragaurora.com/Fifty_Percent_Parking_Garage.PDF
This whole effort will subsidize future developers parking for Transit Oriented Development (TOD).
Many of the potpourri of transportation projects the city wants to fund with
this tax increase, reflects the fact that some of the growth occurring in Aurora
has not paid for itself. The city is trying to place the burden of these expanded
transportation projects on existing residents.
Aurora voters, who have told council year after year that they will not tolerate new taxes,
will once again inform their elected public servants to temper their illusions of grandeur,
live with the current budget and will vote NO on 2B.
Top
~ ### ~
City of Aurora - "Desperate" for Internet Sale Taxes
June 26, 2012
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(Aurora, Colorado) - On the heels of moving forward placing a property tax mill levy tax extension on the
2012 ballot,
and a proposal to double tax Aurora residents, starting in 2014,
to complete the
I-225 FasTracks line,
the City of Aurora is now lobbying to change
law at the federal level to allow for the collection of sales taxes on internet purchases.
As noted in recent Public and Intergovernmental Relations Committee meeting summary notes
[Federal Update]
the City of Aurora has a large law firm tracking legislation that
promotes changes in federal law, to allow for the collection of municipal sales taxes on
internet purchases.
As stated in the meeting minutes "H.R. 3179 was introduced and would authorize states to
force retailers to collect sales taxes, even online firms, and even when their customers
reside in states where the companies have no physical presence."
In addition, the minutes noted that "Mr. Feeley stated that while everyone is
desperate
to find an appropriate legislative vehicle, it is unlikely that a decision will be made
on the bills before the November elections." Also noted in the minutes was the statement
"CM Broom indicated that he would place a phone call to Representative Coffman to express
our interest and position on the issue."
Citizens for Responsible Aurora Government (CRAG) recently spoke before city council to
voice our opposition
to this whole scheme. Using retailers as government tax
collectors and extracting more money from Aurora voters, seems to currently occupy much
of city council's time.
As Aurora residents struggle with their own personal financial issues, the city elected
public servants continue to plot ways to remove more tax money from Aurora voters.
http://www.cragaurora.com/Tax_Mill_Levy_Tax_Hike.PDF
http://www.aurorasentinel.com/news/aurora-voters-could-be-asked-to-pay-for-i-225-light-rail/
http://www.cragaurora.com/PIR_Federal_Update.PDF
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ak085nQd50&feature=plcp
Top
~ ### ~
Gaylord's Last Grasp . . .
April 30, 2012
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Stand alone link
Gaylord RTA subsidy hearing: A rare, open, transparent, public testimony.
(Aurora) - Public testimony concluded on April 23rd before the
Colorado Economic Development Commission Regional Tourism Authority (RTA)
hearing on awarding state sales tax subsidies to two projects which would
promote outside/additional tourism in Colorado. After two days of hearings,
April 10th and April 23rd, the RTA is scheduled to announce their decision on May 18th.
Related news story (link):
Aurora Sentinal
One of the projects competing for the state sales tax subsidy is Gaylord Entertainment.
In June of 2011, the City of Aurora announced with great fanfare, a deal worked out with
Gaylord, which would provide hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer subsidies for
Gaylord to build a hotel/convention center complex in north Aurora.
Citizens for Responsible Aurora Government (CRAG) testified before Aurora City Council
in August 2011, highlighting the egregious nature of this Gaylord agreement:
http://cragaurora.com/#Gaylord
Unlike the recently completed RTA public hearings, all the previous Gaylord negotiations
were done behind closed doors, with no public input. Government bureaucrats and elected
officials worked out all the details and then told taxpayers what their liabilities would
be to subsidize this project.
CRAG notes that the RTA hearings were a good example of how the public could be involved
in providing input and airing issues related to subsidizing a billion dollar, publicly
traded, out-of-state corporation. The City of Aurora's clandestine coup, negotiating
this massive subsidy in secret, was an insult to Aurora taxpayers.
~ ### ~
Read news coverage of the Gaylord Entertainment issue here=>
http://yourhub.denverpost.com/aurora/colorado-officials-make-decision-gaylord-deal-aurora/KreS2KHwtc52a3ASntZaRL-story
Top
~ ### ~
Aurora Corporate Welfare – Knows No Bounds
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 25, 2011
(Aurora) - On the heels of the recent massive taxpayer giveaway to the Gaylord Entertainment Corporation, the City of Aurora has joined forces with Adams County and the State of Colorado to reward yet another billion dollar corporation with resident tax dollars.
As reported in the local media
www.denverpost.com and
www.aurorasentinel.com.
General Electric's PrimeStar Solar will locate a
manufacturing plant in Aurora and receive a total
of $28 million dollars in taxpayer subsidies.
Jim Frye, a member of Citizens for Responsible
Aurora Government (CRAG) and a local candidate for
city council at-large, requested a copy of the
agreement from the Aurora City Clerks office.
The response he received noted
"Just to let you know that the draft
document of the City of Aurora/General Electric
incentive agreement for locating a solar
manufacturing plant document is still being worked
on and is currently not a public record. Since it
is still being worked on, it is not determined when
it will be available for public view."
CRAG finds it interesting that the actual document
does not yet exist. It is difficult to determine what
the City of Aurora portion of the subsidy will be,
where the money will come from and what the ultimate
cost to Aurora taxpayers will be.
It appears the City of Aurora will provide
subsidies to any and all large corporations that
consider Aurora to locate their businesses. CRAG
is asking the city why all businesses in the city
are not afforded the same breaks that these large
corporations receive and why existing businesses
and residents have to carry the tax freight for
these large corporations. Aurora city government
has now become the arbiter, picking and choosing
the winners and losers.
As noted in this article from March,
abcnews.go.com
the General Electric Corporation paid no federal
income tax in 2010. We find it ironic that in
addition to paying no federal taxes, we have the
State of Colorado, Adams County and the City of
Aurora providing subsidies to GE.
Top
~ ### ~
Aurora City Council Approves placing
the Forever Tax on this Fall's Ballot
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 17, 2011
(Aurora) - Aurora City Council formally referred the second of three
new tax increase proposals to the November 1st ballot.
The citizen initiated bond issue would do the following:
-
Incur $133 million of capital bond debt to build 3 new recreation
centers and renovate a 4th center
-
Initially incur $2.2 million dollars a year in expense debt to fund
operations, maintenance, and repair
-
Override TABOR with a clause to automatically increase taxes for
operations, adjusted for inflation, for up to 5% per year.
This component is the forever tax that can increase yearly,
without voter approval.
Consequences of this ballot issue:
(Click here for a copy of the ballot language. Recreation Center Ballot Wording)
-
Current city residential property taxes average approximately 10.5
mills. The combined initial mill levy to support this measure will
be 4.58 mills. This one ballot measure will initially raise
residential property taxes by 43%.
-
In addition to the cost of building and operating the centers,
residents will be charged significant fees to utilize the facilities.
(Click here for proposed fee structure. Proposed Rec Fee Schedule).
These fees will keep some residents on the outside looking in.
-
Aurora activist Duane Senn recently spoke before Aurora City Council
to highlight concerns about this project.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6VFwkWqqkA
-
This tax increase will also significantly impact business property
owners, who carry a much higher tax rate burden that residential
residents.
-
With Aurora residents struggling to cope with the economic downturn,
this hardly seems like the time to saddle them with another
significant tax increase for facilities that will only be used by a
fraction of the residents.
-
For detailed consequences of this ballot issue,
(click here: Detailed Notes)
Citizens for Responsible Aurora Government, or CRAG is a citizens
group dedicated to accountability, transparency, and fiscal
responsibility in the city of Aurora, Colorado.
For more information visit our web site at
http://www.cragaurora.com,
email us at info@cragaurora.com,
or call us at 720.295.8402.
Top
~ ### ~
Aurora City Council - Gaming the System
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 2, 2011
(Aurora) - Gaming the system - or as it is known in Aurora - Incentive Agreement By and Among
- The City of Aurora Colorado
- Aurora Urban Renewal Authority
- And Gaylord Entertainment Company
Having had an opportunity to analyze the 130 page
"incentive" agreement
between the city and Gaylord, along with the 40 page Urban Renewal
"blight" document,
Citizens For Responsible Aurora Government (CRAG) recently made the following presentation
before Aurora City Council.
Highlights of the presentation included:
- How the city is abusing the Urban Renewal "blighting" law
- Circumventing the Colorado Constitution on donation of public funds
- Potentially obligating Aurora taxpayers to debt, without a vote of the people
- Generating a whole new slew of taxes and taxing areas
Aurora is again attempting to blight raw, undeveloped, agricultural land.
After a similar tactic was used by Aurora in 2010, blighting agricultural
land for the Lend Lease project, state senator Morgan Carroll sponsored a
bill to prohibit this type of abuse of the "blighting" laws. The only
problem was that there were several loopholes. The City of Aurora is
using one of these loopholes to foster a massive tax giveaway ($300 million)
to "incent" Gaylord to locate a hotel and convention center in the City of Aurora.
The particular loophole that the city is using is noted in the state statutes
as "No area that has been designated as an urban renewal area shall contain
any agricultural land unless each public body that levies an ad valorem property
tax on such land agrees in writing to its inclusion within the urban renewal area."
Who are these government "bodies?"
- City of Aurora
- Adams County
- Brighton School District
- Urban Drainage and Flood Control
- Urban Drainage South Platte
- Rangeview Library District
- A new General Improvement District (GID)
Have these entities been contacted? Have they made any decision?
On page 52 and 53 of the incentive agreement, you will find a detailed breakout
of the tax giveaways that are part of this proposal. Obtaining a "blight"
designation will allow the developer to receive a "Tax Increment Financing" designation.
This in turn will allow for the avalanche of tax subsidies. All details are in
the incentive agreement. Also, the Aurora City Council is providing a "Moral Obligation Pledge"
to secure potential bonds of over $200 million dollars that would be issued by the
Aurora Urban Renewal Authority. This was done without a vote of the Aurora taxpayers
on this potential debt obligation..
Other taxes noted include "lodger taxes" of 12.6% per day, all going to the developer and new
"admission" taxes, again all noted on pages 52 & 53 of the incentive document.
In addition, property owners will be voting on a new General Improvement District and
"Enhanced Taxing Area?" You can view a map of the area here.
Map of GID
CRAG encourages development in the City of Aurora - for projects that can be built on
their own merits--and not a giant taxpayer subsidy. We urge the affected government "bodies"
in this development area to reject this tax giveaway of 25-33 years and send a message to the
Aurora City Council that this is no way to do business.
For more information you can contact CRAG at
info@cragaurora.com - 720.295.8402 -
cragaurora.com
~ ### ~
=> Media Links:
Denver Post reports on Gaylord
http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_18737218?IADIDM
Channel 7 News quoted C.R.A.G.:
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/28945953/detail.html
Article in the Denver Post
http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_18737218
Article in the Aurora Sentinel:
www.aurorasentinel.com
Duane Senn interviewed with Peter Boyles on 8/2:
http://www.khow.com
Duane's interview goes from 0:0 –12:26.
Jim Frye interviewed with Liz Lane at KGNU radio, broadcasted on Wednesday, 8/3:
http://www.kgnu.org/morningmag
Click - on Wednesday – August 3rd – Scroll to 16:43 - Jim's interview goes to 22:16.
View media interviews regarding the Gaylord Entertainment Project
Top
~ ### ~
Aurora Mayor Ponders Turning off the TV
July 30, 2011
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
(Aurora) - Before Citizens For Responsible Aurora Government (CRAG)
commenced their second slideshow at the Aurora City Council on July
25th, Aurora Mayor Ed Tauer apparently suggested council consider
turning off the TV cameras when citizens come to testify before city council.
As noted by an Aurora Sentinel editorial writer,
(http://www.aurorasentinel.com/hp_columnists/article_289c5610-b920-11e0-abb9-001cc4c002e0.html)
on July 28th, the mayor was not keen on CRAG testifying before
council, using Power Point slides that Aurora voters could view on the
local Channel 8 TV. The CRAG presentation on July 25th dealt with the
massive taxpayer subsidy for the Gaylord Entertainment complex to be
located near DIA.
As noted below, CRAG member, Greg Golyansky, has submitted an open
letter to the mayor requesting a response to this alleged attempt to
stifle free speech in Aurora.
OPEN LETTER TO HONORABLE ED TAUER, MAYOR OF AURORA, COLORADO.
Your Honor,
On July 28th, an editorial writer with the Aurora Sentinel noted that
you recently expressed a desire to put an end to TV coverage for
citizens using power point slides while presenting at city council. In
fact, the writer implied that this action was directed specifically at
the Citizens for Responsible Aurora Government - CRAG.
It was noted that it appeared this suggestion came about because of
the critical nature of CRAG calling council to task for its actions on
various issues.
CRAG's most recent presentation on the Gaylord affair and our
contention that it is "gaming the system" and not "economic
development" apparently got your ire.
CRAG thinks these issues ought to be discussed publicly, in an open
forum, and not behind closed doors. Taxpayers are the ones footing the
bill for the million dollar TV production facilities at Aurora City
Council. To deny us access to the same video capabilities as council
members would be an abuse of council authority.
Because of the importance of this issue, I have chosen the "Open
Letter" venue and will release this letter to the press.
If you choose not to answer my letter or to end the TV coverage of the
public comment portion of the City Council meetings your actions will
speak volumes in their own right.
Respectfully,
Gregory N. Golyansky - member, Citizens for Responsible Aurora Government
For more info on CRAG contact:
Info@cragaurora.com
720.295.8402
cragaurora.com
Top
~ ### ~
Current Investigations
Aurora City Council
First Salvo of Many Tax Increase Proposals for 2011
July 20, 2011
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(Aurora) – You know we are approaching election season when the tax increase measures
start being approved by Aurora City Council.
The first in an anticipated barrage of tax increase proposals was approved and referred to
the ballot by Aurora City Council on July 11th.
This latest tax increase is a repeat variation of a measure that voters rejected in 2009.
The Mission Viejo library General Improvement District (GID) was approved for referral to
affected voters, by the council, on a 9-1 vote. Highlights of the measure, which will
appear on the November 1st ballot, include:
-
This tax agreement resulted from a lawsuit settlement with the Mission Viejo HOA,
challenging the closure of the Mission Viejo library.
The city closed this library after the 2009 tax increase proposal was defeated.
The settlement allowed the surrounding homeowners to
tax themselves twice for a service
the city should already be providing.
-
Taxes would once again be funneled to the city general fund and not a special district.
-
To support this one library, the affected property owners would be subjected to:
-
First year increased mill levy of approximately 1.1 mills
-
City of Aurora property taxes increased by 9%
-
All to raise $750,000 per year, for this one library
-
The ballot wording overrides TABOR, automatically raising mill levies to maintain this funding,
if assessed property values decline. Voters never get to vote again.
-
Interestingly, the GID boundaries are approximately eleven times larger than the original
Mission Viejo development. (Click Here for Map)
-
The city and the HOA arbitrarily selected the large GID boundary.
Citizens for Responsible Aurora Government (CRAG), a local activist group dedicated to transparency,
accountability and fiscal responsibility, is disappointed but not surprised that the Aurora City Council
has again ignored the voters will and placed this measure on the ballot.
Opponent presentations from the public testimony at city council can be viewed in the
following 3 minute video clips. CRAG continues to urge the Aurora City Council to end this lack of
leadership and start making hard decisions to prioritize where our tax revenues are spent.
When council faces a revenue shortfall or perceived shortfall their first knee-jerk reaction
is to raise taxes.
Citizens for Responsible Aurora Government, or CRAG is a citizens group
dedicated to accountability, transparency, and fiscal responsibility in
the city of Aurora, Colorado.
For more information you can contact Jim Frye with CRAG at
http://www.cragaurora.com,
or call us at 720.295.8402 or email us at info@cragaurora.com.
=> Mission Viejo GID map
Denver Post article:
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_18636321
Top
~ ### ~
|
|
|
|